The Magna Carta is an ancient document that has acquired an almost mythical status of being a document that advanced man's 'right to justice' all the way back in the thirteenth century, in countries that received English laws.
This book written by Dan Jones very helpfully included the full text of the Magna Carta (1215) all its 63 paragraphs in Latin and the English translations side-by-side, as well as the people involved with the Magna Carta and pulling back the timeline all the way back to 1100 to contextualize how the Magna Carta came into existence.
It is written in an engaging way, and I thought it was quite insightful when the timeline was pulled further back from way before King John was crowned. Instead of singlely fingering King John as the cause of the barons' unhappiness, Jones took a broader view that earlier actions taken by earlier kings had resulted in the culmulation of the 'rebellious' barons trying to not have King John had his own singular way.
I thought it was interesting to have interpreted the Magna Carta from a longer timeline, and wonder if the interpretation of the failures of kingdom and dynasties might hve been seen in a different light and interpreted differently if the timeline had been pulled back for a longer period as Jones had done in the case of the Magna Carta.
Also interestingly, the adjective 'rebellious' was applied to the group of barons who revolted against King John. Up to today, these barons are still described as 'rebellious', despite the monarchy having changed Houses since the Magna Carta times. These barons were considered 'rebellious' from King John's perspective, and that considerations did not seem to have fade with time.
No comments:
Post a Comment